soname number bump for audit-libs

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Mon Aug 10 18:11:44 UTC 2009


On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 13:02 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> 
> Submitting a new package request and expecting it to be reviewed in
> under a week is simply not reasonable.  Sorry, it just isn't.  If
> reviews are going to be blocked on package reviews, get those reviews in
> early, not at the last minute.
> 
> If something important, like a new feature or something disruptive like
> this is going to be held up by a package review but needs to get done by
> feature or alpha freeze time, please make an announcement to that
> effect, or at least indicate that in the review itself.  The review in
> question (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514602) said
> nothing about this issue.  Otherwise the reviewers have no idea that
> they should prioritize this review.

Or line up a peer to do your review instead of just waiting for a
volunteer to pick up the review.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090810/7a582b9f/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list