Updates lacking descriptions

[Seth Vidal]

On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Adam Williamson wrote:

> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 17:59 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:53:57 +0200, Kevin wrote:
>>
>>> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>
>>>> With you folks demanding more explicit changelogs you are rudestly
>>>> pushing around package maintainers and force them to waste time to
>>>> fullfill your solely burecratic demands.
>>>
>>> You're free to leave.
>>
>> Won't speak for Ralf, but I consider such a comment as insolent.
>> It's not how fellow Fedora contributors should communicate with
>> eachother. Certainly not in public messages.
>
> Why the double standard? If you consider what Michael wrote to be
> 'insolent', Ralf's mail was certainly far far beyond that, with its
> opening suggestion that Michael is a dribbling moron - "as ususal, you
> are demonstrating your lack of competence and understanding" - its
> follow-up suggestion that he's a paper-pushing nincompoop - "you are
> rudestly pushing around package maintainers and force them to waste time
> to fullfill your solely burecratic demands" - and final salvo indicating
> that he's 'hostile and rude' for using a newsgroup gateway - "You simply
> are violating the netiquette ... i.e. you are hostile and rude to this
> lists users". I'd say that was a fairly mild response.


This thread is over. Additional, helpful comments can either start a new 
thread or go offlist.


-sv