[RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA

Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Tue Dec 1 07:12:27 UTC 2009

Le lundi 30 novembre 2009 à 19:24 -0600, Matthew Woehlke a écrit :
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > When i18n asked what was the exact need for bitmap-fonts no one
> answered.

Bitmap-fonts is an exact package name installed by default for no reason
anyone would justify

> Legibility?
> I don't know about font systems, is Terminuis a "core font"? It is 
> bitmapped, but I don't know if that automatically makes it a "core
> font".

It does not make it automatically a "core font".

Look, people, either take my word core fonts are bad, and induce
maintenance, or make the effort to document yourself.

Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20091201/1dbcb59a/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list