Build Failure regarding Boost
ngompa13 at gmail.com
Wed Dec 2 01:26:28 UTC 2009
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Tim Niemueller <tim at niemueller.de> wrote:
> On 01.12.2009 19:15, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > Broadly speaking (beyond just Fedora), there's enough variability in the
> > potential names of Boost libraries that a package's configuration needs
> > the ability to specify a Boost library suffix. It sounds like your
> > package's configuration is trying to be clever and divine the required
> > suffix--and it's failing and falling back to no suffix.
> > If your package's configuration won't let you specify a suffix, the most
> > expedient thing to do may be just to hack it on. But an upstream-worthy
> > patch would add a means to specify an arbitrary suffix. Also, -mt is a
> > saner default than no suffix at all.
> The suffix is determined in /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindBoost.cmake
> which is part of cmake, so there is nothing I can do about this in the
> Player package. Could this be a problem with new cmake or boost versions?
> Tim Niemueller <tim at niemueller.de> www.niemueller.de
> Imagination is more important than knowledge. (Albert Einstein)
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
Perhaps CMake needs to be updated to 2.8.0 final? I think there was a
FindBoost.cmake update in 2.8.0...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the fedora-devel-list