Proposed F13 feature: drop separate updates repository
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Wed Dec 2 16:28:24 UTC 2009
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:09:41AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Matthew Booth (mbooth at redhat.com) said:
> > The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've
> > been using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places to
> > look when searching for packages manually, and twice as much to
> > configure when you're configuring yum. It has never benefitted me,
> > or anybody I know, but it has caught me out on any number of
> > occasions. What's more, nobody really seems to know why it's like
> > that: it seems it's always been that way, and nobody ever bother to
> > fix it.
> > So lets fix it. The package set at release time is only interesting
> > to historians. If any of them are really that bothered, I'm sure
> > somebody can come up with a yum module which finds the oldest
> > available version of a package in a repo.
> The separate Everything tree that does not get obsoleted is required
> in some form for GPL compliance, with respect to the ISO images that
> we ship. Any new solution would have to preserve this.
Might there also be export compliance implications too?
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
More information about the fedora-devel-list