Fedora release criteria completely revised

Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at chello.at
Tue Dec 8 14:07:21 UTC 2009

Adam Williamson wrote:
> During FUDCon, we've been working on revising the Fedora release criteria.
> John Poelstra had already fleshed out a structure and much of the final
> content, and we've been revising and tweaking it in conjunction with QA
> (myself, Will Woods and James Laska), release engineering (Jesse Keating),
> anaconda team (especially Denise Dumas and Peter Jones) and desktop team
> (Christopher Aillon and Matthias Clasen, who provided suggestions at an
> earlier stage).

So once again things get decided by a small group of people in an in-person 
meeting and whoever didn't happen to be at the right place at the right time 
only gets to know the final decision after the fact? :-( I've complained 
many times about this lack of transparency and I'll continue to do so.

Plus, why was the KDE SIG not invited? (We had at least 4 KDE SIG folks 
present at FUDCon.) Are you planning to ship Fedora 13 even if the KDE Live 
image is broken?

        Kevin Kofler

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list