Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
rc040203 at freenet.de
Wed Dec 9 17:05:36 UTC 2009
On 12/09/2009 05:51 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 12/09/2009 04:14 PM, James Antill wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:26 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> So, yeh, if _you_ want to support slower machines
>> Well, I do not want to, I can't avoid to ...
>>> ... _you_ will have
>>> to do the work, you might get help from the community but just ranting
>>> on f-d-l "Everyone should solve my problems" is unlikely to actually
>>> help. IMO.
>> There is an easier solution: Stop using/promoting/advertising Fedora
>> and switch to a different distro ...
> okay, for you, that sounds like it may be the best option. You are
> obviously unhappy with fedora.
Did I say this? I am unhappy with Fedora's management's decisions.
Technically, Fedora is quite usable (most of the time), on more or
> We've appreciated your constructive
> contributions but if you are no longer interested in working on/with
> fedora, then we wish you well in your endeavors.
If I wasn't interested in Fedora, I wouldn't complain. It's just that
Fedora increasingly diverges from my needs and increasingly is not
applicable for my purposes.
Less abstract: This development forces me to not recommend Fedora (or
RHEL) to customers.
> It would be most polite to officially orphan your packages before you go.
Thanks you for sheding more insights in how you intend to take community
interests into account.
More information about the fedora-devel-list