mono and snk key files

Adam Goode adam at
Tue Dec 15 00:45:43 UTC 2009

On 12/13/2009 06:16 AM, Christopher Brown wrote:
> 2009/12/11 Adam Goode <adam at>:
>> We should definitely use Debian's key, right? Otherwise some Fedora CLI
>> libraries would be unnecessarily incompatible with Debian, and whoever
>> else uses Debian's key.
>> The whole business of not shipping code-signing keys is a little
>> contrary to open source. I think this is something that GPLv3 would
>> prohibit. We should use a single well-known signing key for any package
>> that we don't have the keys for, I think.
> You're right.
> This has already been resolved in devel by added mono.snk to the
> mono-devel package. I'm just waiting on commit access to make the
> required changes to F-11 and F-12 unless someone else wants to do it.

It looks like spot generated a new mono.snk. I was arguing to use
Debian's mono.snk, for cross-distro compatibility. Shouldn't everyone
should use Debian's key unless a package provides its own?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list