dist-git proof of concept phase 1 complete

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Tue Dec 15 17:44:55 UTC 2009

On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 12:15 +0100, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
> Do you have any plan about hooks ?
> Since 1 package = 1 repository, does that mean package maintainers
> will
> be able to define their own hooks ? (bad idea) will we have some
> pre-defined hooks (like bz integration) ? or something like github
> webhooks or bitbucket brokers ?

We'll definitely have some mandatory hooks.  The first one we're looking
at is a hook to do branch level ACLs.  Also, I seem to recall that you
would need shell access to the remote repo in order to add a hook, so it
would not be possible for maintainers to add their own remote hooks.

Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20091215/94c81ca5/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list