dist-git proof of concept phase 1 complete
a.badger at gmail.com
Tue Dec 15 20:35:16 UTC 2009
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:22:35AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 13:16 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > I'd like to suggest (again ;) that origin/devel be used. Either that,
> > or use master as the local dir, e.g. kernel/master. Having it differ
> > seems like a recipe for unneeded confusion.
> I'm willing to listen to other opinions on this. Personally I'd really
> rather not change the meaning of origin/master. "devel" would show up
> as a directory in the "classic" view only to match what CVS did. I'd
> even be willing to make two directories, one a symlink to the other.
> You'd get kernel/master and you'd also get kernel/devel as a symlink to
master makes a lot of sense from a git perspective. devel (or rawhide)
makes sense from what we actually call the code that that branch eventually
makes. A symlink might alleviate the confusion but it could also add to it.
(For instance, I was operating in the kernel/devel branch but when I want to
git checkout -b devel git gives me a strange error.)
I don't see a clear answer for what's best here, yet. :-(
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the fedora-devel-list