dist-git proof of concept phase 1 complete
schwab at redhat.com
Wed Dec 16 17:33:39 UTC 2009
Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:13:33AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> writes:
>> > On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 13:33 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> >> My thinking is that we don't use origin/next or origin/maint either
>> >> and both are common upstream in git and the kernel.
>> >> While origin/master is common,
>> > origin/master isn't "common", it's the friggin default. Every single
>> > git repo I interact with has development happening on origin/master.
>> > It's way more than just "common".
>> You can set any branch as default via origin/HEAD, and some do. It is
>> also easy to make origin/devel an alias for origin/master.
> So what's an alias?
See git-symbolic-ref(1). HEAD is an example.
> If that's so, that's a much better solution than a symlink.
They used to be implemented with a symlink.
Andreas Schwab, schwab at redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for something completely different."
More information about the fedora-devel-list