Possible wrong versions tagged into f12-final

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Wed Dec 16 23:02:02 UTC 2009


On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 11:19 +0000, Quentin Armitage wrote:
> I've noticed what might be a couple of anomalies regarding which
> versions of packages have been tagged into f12-final.  
> 
> freenx-client: 0.9-9.fc12 was built as part of the dist-f12-rebuild, but
> 0.9-10.fc11 tagged has been tagged into f12-final.
> 
> gauche: 0.8.14.3.fc12 was built during the mass F12 rebuild, but
> 0.8.14.3.fc11 has been tagged into f12-final. It appears that
> 0.8.14-2.fc12 was built after 0.8.14-3.fc12 (during the mass F12
> rebuild).
> 
> Quentin Armitage
> 
> 

Yeah, looks like some fallout around the mass rebuild and getting things
tagged over.  Too late to do anything about F12 now, owners of those
packages might consider issuing updates (which would then be picked up
in F13)

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20091216/43e8037f/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list