Mass rebuild for F13?
mclasen at redhat.com
Mon Dec 21 13:57:14 UTC 2009
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 07:38 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 07:03:13AM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> >> It would be nice if you folks add these little explanations as
> >> comments next to the patches of the gcc SPEC file. (this is also a
> >> packaging requirement ).
> > 1) gcc-4.4-RH has its own svn branch in upstream repository, so the
> > src.rpm contains only very few patches, most of the changes are
> > simply committed to the svn branch. svn commit logs contain
> > all relevant info.
> > 2) the patches (~ 20) that are left have comments in their bodies,
> > rather than in the spec file, which is much more maintainable.
> Yeah, those comments in the patches are quite informative, like "libtool sucks".
> Seriously, this "comment about the patch in the specfile" is a
> packaging requirement, not a personal request.
Keeping comments in patches is perfectly fine; if the packaging
guidelines don't reflect that, they ought to be clarified.
More information about the fedora-devel-list