major ghc breakage: anybody working on fixing them?
Rahul Sundaram
sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Wed Dec 23 22:52:02 UTC 2009
On 12/24/2009 04:15 AM, Alex Lancaster wrote:
>>>>>> Alex Lancaster writes:
>
>>>>>> Rawhide Report writes:
>> So these huge slew of broken deps (seems like more than 10 packages)
>> for ghc have been in the rawhide reports for over a week now, is
>> anybody actively maintaining and/or planning to fix these packages?
>> If not, please let us know so a provenpackager can fix these, they
>> overwhelm the rawhide log and make it more likely that people ignore
>> the entire broken dep log. It seems like it is only a version number
>> in a subpackage that needs building or somesuch, so hopefully it is
>> trivial to fix.
>
> Hmm, this is odd, I noticed that according to:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20091223/logs/repodiff
>
> abiword was successfully rebuilt:
Abiword situation is explained at
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2009-December/msg00357.html
Rahul
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list