Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide-20090126 with gcc-4.4.0-0.9

[seth vidal]

On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 17:49 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 11:35:23AM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > > They were referenced in the links.
> > > Anyway, here is the list of all packages that didn't build successfully
> > > with 4.4, for details look at the provided links or try to build in
> > > dist-f11-gcc44 --scratch yourself (Karsten, could you please build libtool
> > > in dist-f11-gcc44, so that people actually can do that themselves?
> > > I only had a --scratch libtool build in my local repo).
> > 
> > I'm confused - you have yum mentioned in this list but it's not in any
> > of the directories you linked to before.
> 
> Ah, right, forgot about those, there are also 117 failures because a newer
> package has been built in rawhide since 20090126 and so wget used in the
> script failed to grab it during the mass rebuild.  So, those packages
> weren't attempted to be rebuilt at all, they might pass, or might fail.
> 
> Sorry.

Not a problem. I was mainly confused b/c yum isn't compiled, at all, so
the gcc changes had me fairly well boggled as to how they impact yum. :)

Thanks for the explanation and thanks for the report in general, it's
great.
-sv