Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide-20090126 with gcc-4.4.0-0.9

Conrad Meyer konrad at tylerc.org
Tue Feb 3 21:11:15 UTC 2009


On Tuesday 03 February 2009 10:59:44 am Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 03.02.2009 17:21, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 05:01:24PM +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> >> Jakub Jelinek schrieb:
> >>> In the past few days I've done a mass rebuild of rawhide-20090126
> >>> in mock with gcc-4.4.0-0.9 (and corresponding libtool).
> >>> 6228 packages were successfully built, for the rest I've tried
> >>> to rebuild them also with gcc-4.3.2-7 (though I ran out of time,
> >>> so a couple of packages weren't attempted with 4.3).
> >>
> >> If may be helpful, if you can publish a list with packages which caused
> >> issues with the new compiler. So we may be able to fix the issue without
> >> the need to tryout all of our packages.
> >
> > They were referenced in the links.
> > Anyway, here is the list of all packages that didn't build successfully
> > with 4.4, [...]
>
> Finding all your packages in such a long list gets really hard as soon
> as you maintain 10 or 15 packages. Here is a list of packages with thir
> owners, sorted by owner; generated with fedoradev-pkgowners:
> http://thorstenl.blogspot.com/2007/09/fedoradev-pkgowners-get-package-owner
>s.html Should make things a lot easier. Use at your own risk.
>
> ...
>
> CU
> knurd

Thanks, very helpful!

-- 
Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org>




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list