Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide-20090126 with gcc-4.4.0-0.9

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 04:11:20PM +0100, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
>> In the past few days I've done a mass rebuild of rawhide-20090126
>> in mock with gcc-4.4.0-0.9 (and corresponding libtool).
>> 6228 packages were successfully built, for the rest I've tried
>> to rebuild them also with gcc-4.3.2-7 (though I ran out of time,
>> so a couple of packages weren't attempted with 4.3).
>
> If we fix a package, are we supposed to perform a normal (i.e. not  
> scratch) build into dist-f11-gcc44 (and/or dist-f11)? Or should we just  
> tag and let it be (for a new mass rebuild)?

Either just tag, or tag and build into dist-f11.

	Jakub