Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide-20090126 with gcc-4.4.0-0.9

[seth vidal]

On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 17:21 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 05:01:24PM +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> > Jakub Jelinek schrieb:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > In the past few days I've done a mass rebuild of rawhide-20090126
> > > in mock with gcc-4.4.0-0.9 (and corresponding libtool).
> > > 6228 packages were successfully built, for the rest I've tried
> > > to rebuild them also with gcc-4.3.2-7 (though I ran out of time,
> > > so a couple of packages weren't attempted with 4.3).
> > >
> > If may be helpful, if you can publish a list with packages which caused
> > issues with the new compiler. So we may be able to fix the issue without
> > the need to tryout all of our packages.
> 
> They were referenced in the links.
> Anyway, here is the list of all packages that didn't build successfully
> with 4.4, for details look at the provided links or try to build in
> dist-f11-gcc44 --scratch yourself (Karsten, could you please build libtool
> in dist-f11-gcc44, so that people actually can do that themselves?
> I only had a --scratch libtool build in my local repo).

I'm confused - you have yum mentioned in this list but it's not in any
of the directories you linked to before.


> yum-3.2.21-3.fc11.src.rpm


is it missing its results?
-sv