Summary of the 2009-02-03 Packaging Committee meeting

[Toshio Kuratomi]

Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Meeting minutes and full logs of the 2009-02-03 FPC meeting are
> online:
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Minutes
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Minutes/20090203
> 
> Summary:
> 
> The following drafts are now official guidelines, having been accepted
> by FESCO last week:
> 
> 
> * Updated Haskell Guidelines - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell
> * Symlinks - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Symlinks
> 
> These should be written into the guidelines soon if this hasn't
> already been done by the time you read this.
> 
> Issues pending FESCO ratification:
> 
> * Resubmission of the Non-obvious spec file items draft -
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Non-obvious_spec_file_items
>   Hopefully addressing FESCo's concerns.
> 
We also have a modified:
  * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ExplicitRequires

This splits the "comment for non-obvious items" and Explicit Requires
sections so we can treat them as separate issues for ratification.
Sorry for the confusion.

-Toshio

> Misc business:
> 
> * PHP guideline modifications for dealing with channels -
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/PHP
> o FPC requested additional cleanups and clarifications. 
> 
> * ReviewGuideline for fonts -
>    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ReviewGuideline_for_fonts_(2009-01-22)
> o FPC did not accept the draft. 
> 
>  - J<
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090205/6d68e052/attachment.sig>