Heads up: Noarch Subpackages
Matthew Woehlke
mw_triad at users.sourceforge.net
Thu Feb 12 16:28:45 UTC 2009
Joe Orton wrote:
> I take it from the wiki page, that we should hold of on using this too
> aggressively until some distro-wide guidelines are produced?
>
> e.g. for -devel packages given that 99% of the content is generally
> noarch-able there would be a lot of scope for splitting those up.
...except for the important symlinks-to-versioned-.so's? Doesn't that
kind of break things for -devel unless you break it into -devel-libs and
-devel-headers (eek :-( )?
I was thinking -doc would be more likely candidates :-).
--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
Here endeth the rant... which I realize is not likely to Win Friends or
Influence People, especially the person to whom it was directed.
-- Charles Wilson (generalized)
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list