Heads up: mdadm-3.0-0.devel2.1.fc11 added to f11

[Radek Vykydal]

Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 11:28 +0100, Radek Vykydal wrote:
>   
>> Ok, my concern is a fix to appear in 64-md-raid.rules we use in F11.
>> I sent the patch to Harald Hoyer, he applied the patch to fedora udev
>> package, udev upstream applied it (modified), and it will
>> appear in udev-138 package. So, taking the rules file from mdadm
>> package, we need to use mdadm upstream having rules file
>> from udev-138, or use patched rules file from udev package.
>>     
>
> This means that mdadm and udev-138 will have a file conflict.  If it's
> already in udev, I'll just remove it from mdadm.
>   
They won't, because udev stores it's rule files in /lib/udev/rules.d, 
whereas mdadm
(and packages generally, if I got it right) in /etc/udev/rules.d (they 
have precedence
in case of same name).