x86_32 yum $basearch
jwboyer at gmail.com
Fri Feb 20 15:31:39 UTC 2009
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 09:20:26AM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
>On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 14:12 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> seth vidal wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 09:42 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> >> Now that Fedora 11 x86_32 is going to be based on i586 packages rather
>> >> than i386 packages, does it follow that yum's $basearch will change from
>> >> i386 to i586 and hence repository directory layouts changing too, or
>> >> will it stay at i386?
>> > I don't think it will change. For a few reasons:
>> > 1. non-fedora repos
>> > 2. non-fedora distros
>> > 3. this is why we also have $arch in addition to $basearch
>> > make sense?
>> Certainly from the point of view of being the least disruptive option;
>> it'll just look a bit strange having i386 "Everything" repos with no
>> i386 packages in them...
>Which is why we shouldn't have i386 repos. We should switch
>fedora-release to using $arch and an i586 repo which is a symlink to the
>i686 repo. Then when we phase out i586 in F12, we just remove the i586
>symlink. That way, if anyone wants to maintain a build of fedora for
>i586 or lesser machines then they can do so in the i586 path using
Or you could just have:
Naming repos after specific arches just seems like pain. This is
one area where ppc does things right. You don't see things like:
for ppc32, or:
I'll probably get the "tradition" and "you don't know what you're
talking about" arguments thrown at me. My opinions won't change :).
More information about the fedora-devel-list