Ready for new RPM version?

[Dr. Diesel]

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> wrote:

> Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
>>
>> Are we ready to consider a brand new RPM version for F11, amidst all this
>> mass-rebuild-for-strong-hash chaos and just days to go to development
>> freeze?
>>
>> We just put out first rpm 4.7.0 beta:
>> http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-announce/2009-February/000016.html.
>> This is nothing like the 4.4.2.x -> 4.6.0 leap-of-faith upgrade last year
>> but it's still non-trivial amount of changes to get the kind of memory use
>> and performance improvements that 4.7.0 has, which is why it's not just
>> 4.6.1.
>>
>> The wording of Fedora Feature policy pretty explicitly singles out each
>> RPM upgrade to be a Feature... I would like to hear a preliminary opinion on
>> it: if everybody is going to be an outright "NO!" then I'm not going to
>> waste my time with writing up a Feature page. If it's "maybe" or "it
>> depends" then ok, will submit as a feature in time for tomorrows FESCo
>> meeting.
>>
>> So, should I bother with a RPM 4.7 feature page or not?
>>
>>    - Panu -
>>
>>  F12 maybe?
>

It sure does offer some noticeable improvements, can't let F12 have
everything!


-- 
projecthuh.com
All of my bits are free, are yours?  Fedoraproject.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090226/170d628d/attachment.htm>