Getting started with Rawhide

Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Sat Jan 3 17:59:49 UTC 2009


Le samedi 03 janvier 2009 à 11:45 -0600, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 18:35:52 +0100,
>   Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> wrote:
> > Le mercredi 31 décembre 2008 à 18:33 -0600, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> > > On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 15:37:47 -0700,
> > 
> > > > It appears that glibc in Rawhide (2.8.90) is older than the glibc in
> > > > the initial F10 release (2.9).  Am I seeing that correctly?  If so,
> > > > should I downgrade, or wait for Rawhide to catch up?
> > > 
> > > There are a few other things that have higher versions in F10. That caused
> > > me a bit of grief. The dejavu fonts change also caused some problems.
> > 
> > Could you please expand? The update path is supposed to work, and I
> > notified every single packager that needed to change its deps when the
> > packages were re-organised.
> 
> Well it doesn't. Updates have been pushed for a few packages in F10 updates
> and/or updates testing that have high NVRs than the corresponding rawhide
> NVRs.

Well, I should have been clearer: which dejavu fonts problems did you
encounter?

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090103/c05e6d6b/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list