xzgv in Fedora broken? (was: Re: sound problems)
Hans de Goede
j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
Tue Jan 6 15:06:17 UTC 2009
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:51:07 +0530, Rahul wrote:
> Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
> > Rahul,
> >
> > if my memory is not failing, some packages appeared first in ATrpms
> > than if Fedora (livna/rpmfusion): xvidcap, xzgv, xv, etc. I am not
> > discussing
> > if these packages are useful or not. The fedora version of xzgv was
> > never able
> > to display the thumbnails correctly, for instance. Why? Because it has
> > to be compiled with
> > gcc3.
>
> Was there a bug report filed on this? Again, when problems are in a
> repository, working together to fix the problem is more of a benefit,
> compared to have alternative fixed versions in a place, where majority
> of end users won't benefit from it. If maintainers don't have time,
> step-in and become co-maintainers and fix the problems instead.
Note I'm looking in to fixing the xzgv thumbnails issue. Why? To show that
actually reporting problems helps I guess.
Regards,
Hans
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list