Lua module packages are not multi-lib, how to do?

[yersinia]

2009/1/14 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>

> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 08:25 +0100, Tim Niemueller wrote:
> > Hello Fedora.
> >
> > I've just realized that the Lua module packages that I maintain, which
> > include a Lua module in form of a .so shared object, are not available
> > as multi-lib. I can only ever install the x86_64 version on my machine,
> > yum and packagekit do not provide the i386 version.
> >
> > As an example take lua-posix, it provides /usr/lib64/lua/5.1/posix.so.
> > Probably this does not match some pattern to make it understood as
> > multi-lib. Is there a way I can force this package to be pushed as
> > multi-lib package? Or is it a bug in my spec files and it should already
> > have been recognized as multi-lib?
>
> All multilib means is that the 64-bit repo contains 32-bit packages as
> well as the normal 64-bit packages. By default only packages with a
> -devel subpackage are considered multilib; I think you need to log a
> request with releng to make other packages multilib. And even then
> you'll need a good reason for them to make it so.


Sure ? httpd-devel exists but in the x86_64 branch does not exist httpd
i386. Or it is  an exception ? And if so why ?




>
> --
> Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>
>
> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090114/e4ff20ae/attachment.htm>