Lua module packages are not multi-lib, how to do?

[devzero2000]

2009/1/14 Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com>

> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 13:00 +0100, yersinia wrote:
> > Sure ? httpd-devel exists but in the x86_64 branch does not exist httpd
> > i386. Or it is  an exception ? And if so why ?
>
> That would only happen if the httpd-devel.i386 package had no arch
> specific requires upon the httpd.i386 package.
>

it is very boring not also have the 32 - bit version of httpd on 64 bit SO.
Often it is required the installation commercial 32 bit apache modules - i
am speaking of RHEL . But certainly install an 32 bit operating system on
machines with 10 g of RAM - that i have - is not a thing magnificent. Then
it would be useful to install on a 64  bit SO AND an 32 bit Apache  but the
repo (or RHN) default don't have. Sure, i can do anyway on RHEL5.

(Aside) On Fedora 10 64  bit i have also enabled the repo 32 but strangely
enough, i have an error of conflict (on RHEL5 it is ok) . But that is  off
topic, perhaps.

yum install httpd.i386

Transaction Check Error:
  file /etc/httpd/modules from install of httpd-2.2.10-2.i386 conflicts with
file from package httpd-2.2.10-2.x86_64

The same with squid.

It is also true with %_transaction_color     3 in /etc/rpm/macros.color

Best Regards
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090115/9e03d61c/attachment.htm>