Lua module packages are not multi-lib, how to do?

[yersinia]

2009/1/14 Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com>
>
>
> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 13:00 +0100, yersinia wrote:
>> > Sure ? httpd-devel exists but in the x86_64 branch does not exist httpd
>> > i386. Or it is  an exception ? And if so why ?
>>
>> That would only happen if the httpd-devel.i386 package had no arch
>> specific requires upon the httpd.i386 package.
>>
>
> it is very boring not also have the 32 - bit version of httpd on 64 bit SO.
> Often it is required the installation commercial 32 bit apache modules - i
> am speaking of RHEL . But certainly install an 32 bit operating system on
> machines with 10 g of RAM - that i have - is not a thing magnificent. Then
> it would be useful to install on a 64  bit SO AND an 32 bit Apache  but the
> repo (or RHN) default don't have. Sure, i can do anyway on RHEL5.
>
> (Aside) On Fedora 10 64  bit i have also enabled the repo 32 but strangely
> enough, i have an error of conflict (on RHEL5 it is ok) . But that is  off
> topic, perhaps.
>
> yum install httpd.i386
>
> Transaction Check Error:
>   file /etc/httpd/modules from install of httpd-2.2.10-2.i386 conflicts
> with file from package httpd-2.2.10-2.x86_64
>
> The same with squid.
>
> It is also true with %_transaction_color     3 in /etc/rpm/macros.color
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090115/95d3d581/attachment.htm>