how to show upstream changes to the user

"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" johannbg at hi.is
Tue Jan 27 14:21:20 UTC 2009


Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:57:34 +0100, Dan wrote:
>
>   
>>>>> b) have such a field in bodhi instead
>>>>>           
>>>> The keyword should be "automation". Why to copy&paste when it can be
>>>> done by script. I can imagine a "hidden" field in spec (special comment
>>>> like #changelog: http://....) that is transformed into a field in bodhi.
>>>> It can be a macro in spec that gets evaluated before including in bodhi,
>>>> etc.
>>>>         
>>> If such a thing is in the package, obviously it should be pulled 
>>> automatically by bodhi. You almost certainly need to copy-paste the link 
>>> once anyway - if the field only exists in bodhi then there's just one 
>>> copy-paste. Mind you, I'm not trying to shoot this down, just looking at 
>>> possibilities :)
>>>       
>> I am looking for possibilities too, so there is chance we will meet
>> somewhere :-)
>>     
>
> So far it smells like needless bureaucracy, which you try to advertise as
> "low overhead for maintainers". Only few maintainers would be interested
> in hunting for URLs of changelog web pages for minor/major releases. The
> benefit would be small. Users of open source software packages, which are
> sceptical of updates/upgrades, ought to fetch the source packages and take
> a look at the documentation files in addition to the package changelog.
> Conclusively, make it easy to fetch'n'browse the src.rpm for updates.
>
>   
For the record the change log and reference to bug fixes either in our 
bugzilla or upstream
are extremely useful information for at least testers,triagers and other 
developers to monitor.

So please contain either an http url to the upstream changelog file or an 
file:///usr/share/doc/<component>/changelog at least in the rawhide and 
updates-testing report.

Both the http an file url are easy to use click able solutions.

And please do not remove the reference to a report(s) in bugzilla
 
This tell testers absolutely nothing

- New upstream version
- Update to
- Lots of bug fixes

What does the new upstream/update version bring?
which feature(s)?
which bug(s) got fixed?

While this does....

 References:
[ 1 ] Bug #471709 - add sh architecture support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471709

Update to kernel 2.6.27.12:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.27.10


Well you could of course provide testers with test cases each
time an new update/version is released instead of provide a reference to 
the bug(s) that
are fixed and an url to the changelog so QA could come up with those 
test cases if needed.

JBG
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: johannbg.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 356 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090127/1c2c1e64/attachment.vcf>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list