Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

Brian Pepple bpepple at fedoraproject.org
Thu Jan 29 00:08:28 UTC 2009


On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 00:40 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 28.01.2009, 14:48 -0800 schrieb Jesse Keating:
> > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 23:35 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > >  Some examples:
> > >       * Recently I updated some of the Xfce 4.6 packages. One of them
> > >         was approved without _any_ docs.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732
> also all the desktop files were installed and listed in %files twice and
> if the reviewer had tested the package he would have noticed that. Site
> note: The reviewer has been made a sponsor 2 weeks later.

He was approved as a provenpackager, not as a sponsor.

Later,
/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090128/851519aa/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list