what requires fedora-release-notes
Jason L Tibbitts III
tibbs at math.uh.edu
Thu Jan 29 06:47:56 UTC 2009
>>>>> "JS" == Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta at gmail.com> writes:
JS> Can you explain why you are rebuilding fedora-release?
Because I need to replace the set of repos contained within that
package.
JS> I thought we provided generic-release package so that you don't
JS> have to rebuild fedora-release as part of customization.
Doing that buys me nothing. Because fedora-relase contains more than
just the repos, I have to start with the base package for each release
or I risk missing out on things like system-release-cpe or changes in
the way keys are handled. So I would still have to check
fedora-release out of CVS, copy the bits somewhere, modify it for my
custom stuff, and build it. That's actually another step over just
doing the checkout, patching the fedora-release spec and doing make
noarch.
Either way I'm rebuilding fedora-release. If the only issue is
whether I rename the package, I'm not going to bother. Now, if the
repos would be split out so that I can provide my own without having
to mess with fedora-release, then that would be ideal but my use case
is pretty narrow so I can understand why the suggestion did not
manage any traction.
- J<
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list