Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Christoph Wickert]

Am Donnerstag, den 29.01.2009, 11:09 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot:
> 
> Le Jeu 29 janvier 2009 11:05, Christoph Wickert a écrit :
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, den 29.01.2009, 08:26 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot:
> >> Le mercredi 28 janvier 2009 à 23:35 +0100, Christoph Wickert a écrit
> >> :
> >>
> >> >       * A font package was approved although it contained another
> >> font
> >>
> >> And this was caught in review before the approval and fixed before
> >> cvs
> >> import. So go search your quality problems somewhere else.
> >
> > Both Sven and me corrected my statement already hours before you wrote
> > that mail. Please go search the list before posting.
> >
> > To clarify: I have no problems with "fix that before import" in
> > general,
> > but IMHO for a wrong source it's something different, because a lot of
> > things can not be checked or the checks are useless.
> 
> Why do you assume I didn't check the correct source before approval?

You might have checked the source, but how do you compare it's md5 to
something that's not there? Or how do you compare the timestamp of the
source in the SRPM, if it's not there?

Regards,
Christoph