Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Christoph Wickert]

Am Mittwoch, den 28.01.2009, 20:25 -0500 schrieb Brian Pepple:

> This is all a moot point now though, since a couple of weeks ago FESCo
> approved a proposal to reset the initial seeding of the provenpackager
> group with Packaging Sponsors, and Jesse has made a proposal(1) on
> guidelines for approving someone to the provenpackager group.
> 
>      1. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-January/msg01573.html
> 

IMO this is not a moot point at all, because even after the group was
reset, there are people in there that I don't want to see there.

For example I just found out that one of the people I sponsor is proven
packager. Of course I do trust him, otherwise I would not have sponsored
him, but I doubt that 2 packages (!) and 3 months of experience are
enough for a proven packager.

This shows that Jesse's proposal is pretty much useless, because it is
weaker then the previous set of rules, no matter if it was 5 or 8
packages.

> Later,
> /B

Regards,
Christoph