Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Kevin Kofler]

drago01 wrote:
> The name "Firefox" is worth having for marketing reasons.

But at what costs? It prevents us from fixing real issues, it also forces
the packages to be locked down from provenpackager to make sure nobody can
bypass the trademark approval bureaucracy. IMHO a marketing name is not
worth that.

Not to mention that the artwork is also non-Free, as Debian points out.

        Kevin Kofler