Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Kevin Kofler]

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> How about we require at least one co-maintainer per package and all
> packages that don't have two maintainers in, say, 6 months from now get
> dropped?

That doesn't make sense. Some lone maintainers are doing a very good job of
it and are available almost 24/7, other packages have 2+ maintainers all
slacking off and all unreachable at many times.

I think we need some better metric than just the number of maintainers.

        Kevin Kofler