Package Review Stats for 2008

[Brian Pepple]

On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 12:32 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 12:14:57PM -0500, Brian Pepple wrote:
> > 
> > Looking at the stats the top 5 reviewers did something like 44% of all
> > package reviews.  One of the things I'd like to work on improving in
> > 2009 is to increase the number of reviews done by the folks that did 10
> > or fewer reviews in 2008, since this is where the bulk of our package
> > reviewers lie.
> 
> I don't want to short the "long tail" of reviewers, so perhaps we
> could arrange for a smaller but still significant reward for people
> who did more than "N" reviews.

Yeah, we briefly discussed in the Package Review sig perhaps having a
random drawing of folks that completed x-number of reviews for a period
of time (something like 3 months), and sending them some form of Fedora
swag.

Later,
/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090102/82fc4ce2/attachment.sig>