Package Review Stats for 2008

[Rakesh Pandit]

2009/1/3 Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny at gmail.com>:
> 2009/1/2 Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>:
>> On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 18:36 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>
>>> Twenty reviews of small packages, which are trivial to review (or even
>>> flawless to begin with because the packager is experienced!), or reviews
>>> of package rename requests, may be less of an achievement than one review
>>> of a big beast with dependencies, which has been waiting in the review
>>> queue for many months and needed lots of work.
>>
>> Totally agree with you, but I don't think we have any way currently to
>> differentiate the difficulty between reviews that we could extract into
>> a report.
>
> The number of comments the reviewer himself added to the review ticket
> could give a hint on how to complicated the review was.
>

Sometime reviewer does not take a note of what he has tested [assuming
reporter has already done clever job] unless package fails that test.
So, number of comments are also not a good hint.

-- 
rakesh