Package Review Stats for 2008

[Paul W. Frields]

On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 01:02:39PM -0500, Brian Pepple wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 12:32 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 12:14:57PM -0500, Brian Pepple wrote:
> > > 
> > > Looking at the stats the top 5 reviewers did something like 44% of all
> > > package reviews.  One of the things I'd like to work on improving in
> > > 2009 is to increase the number of reviews done by the folks that did 10
> > > or fewer reviews in 2008, since this is where the bulk of our package
> > > reviewers lie.
> > 
> > I don't want to short the "long tail" of reviewers, so perhaps we
> > could arrange for a smaller but still significant reward for people
> > who did more than "N" reviews.
> 
> Yeah, we briefly discussed in the Package Review sig perhaps having a
> random drawing of folks that completed x-number of reviews for a period
> of time (something like 3 months), and sending them some form of Fedora
> swag.

Perhaps this would be a good compromise -- using randomization to
eliminate bias that favors quantity of simpler reviews.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090103/7de8b87e/attachment.sig>