F10/11 and Intel Integrated Graphics?

[Bob Arendt]

M A Young wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Dan Williams wrote:
> 
>>> While we're complaining, Intel 830M has been broken since F9:
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441665
>> As a workaround, try adding a minimal xorg.conf with:
>>
>> Option "EXANoComposite" "true"
>>
>> I just ran into this updating a Dell Latitude C400 (i830) to F10, and
>> I'm interesting in fixing it.
> 
> It doesn't help with Bug 473809
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473809
> style crashes.
> 
> The Option "AccelMethod" "XAA" suggestion from Bug 441665 does work and
> seems faster than Option "NoAccel" "true" which is what I was previously using.
> 
And neither currently helps with  Bug 469292 (82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469292
But the "XAA" did work for a short period.  Now it doesn't (details in bug).

I remember reading that there are several different generations
of intel graphics chips supported under this one xorg driver.
In the attempt to make a unified intel xorg driver, it appears
that some chipsets have been short-changed / overlooked.