Lua module packages are not multi-lib, how to do?

[yersinia]

2009/1/16 Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com>

> On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 14:29 +0100, devzero2000 wrote:
> > it is very boring not also have the 32 - bit version of httpd on 64 bit
> SO.
> > Often it is required the installation commercial 32 bit apache modules -
> i
> > am speaking of RHEL . But certainly install an 32 bit operating system on
> > machines with 10 g of RAM - that i have - is not a thing magnificent.
> Then
> > it would be useful to install on a 64  bit SO AND an 32 bit Apache  but
> the
> > repo (or RHN) default don't have. Sure, i can do anyway on RHEL5.
> >
> > (Aside) On Fedora 10 64  bit i have also enabled the repo 32 but
> strangely
> > enough, i have an error of conflict (on RHEL5 it is ok) . But that is
>  off
> > topic, perhaps.
> >
> > yum install httpd.i386
> >
> > Transaction Check Error:
> >   file /etc/httpd/modules from install of httpd-2.2.10-2.i386 conflicts
> with
> > file from package httpd-2.2.10-2.x86_64
> >
> > The same with squid.
> >
> > It is also true with %_transaction_color     3 in /etc/rpm/macros.color
>
> The base package can't be multilib, as the paths aren't unique.  You can
> only have one /usr/sbin/httpd and which arch wins if you try to install
> both?  You won't be able to run both a 64bit httpd instance and a 32bit
> httpd instance.
>
> You can do chroots or virt images in order to serve up your 32bit needs
> though.
>

Of course. What i have said is certainly incorrect. Too many mail........

Thanks for the reply.


>
> --
> Jesse Keating
> Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
> identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090116/dffb8c0e/attachment.htm>