pam_console

[Colin Walters]

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:
> Jack Tanner (ihok at hotmail.com) said:
>> You're concerned about the corner cases. I'm concerned about my use case. To
>> say that "it won't ever work well" is wrong, since it works fine for me now.
>> What you call "eliminating confusion" I call "throwing out the baby with the
>> bathwater."
>
> Having never played with mpd, what's the specific usage case you're
> looking for? (i.e., when X happens, the devices should be writable
> by entity Y)

mpd likely wants to install a rule that says "this device should
*always* be accessible by this uid".  Also, it should start pulse
internally.