Lack of update information

[Jesse Keating]

On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 18:17 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote:
>  Yes, actually I did.  Perhaps I misunderstood your meaning here: are
> you saying that it's policy in Fedora that a maintainer should not
> keep their packages up to date in the best fashion that their
> judgement suggests, in line with the above?

No, I'm trying to illustrate that there is a difference between
"tracking upstream" and making judgment calls on proper updates for a
release, and in fact we have policy about it.

> 
> In any case, this is off-topic to the discussion; the question is
> about imposing another manual task on a maintainer, rather than how
> maintainers should exercise their judgement as to pushing updates
> (which the above quote appears to address quite nicely).
-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090127/0da7e94a/attachment.sig>