Lack of update information

[Jesse Keating]

On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 18:47 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote:
>  And all obviated by Fedora policy and practice: we expressly give and
> expect maintainers to exercise their judgement here.
> 
> Unless, of course, we need a Committee of Update Oversight set up...?
> Maybe a new set of highly detailed guidelines, detailing when and how
> updates are to be blessed and released to the great unwashed, or cast
> asunder?

Given that we have maintainers not following the policy, we need to do
something.  By having maintainers mention in the update request /why/
they are issuing an update, it's far easier to spot check and verify.

Trust, but verify.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090127/3c609845/attachment.sig>