Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Brian Pepple]

On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 11:58 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 28.01.2009, 20:25 -0500 schrieb Brian Pepple:
> 
> > This is all a moot point now though, since a couple of weeks ago FESCo
> > approved a proposal to reset the initial seeding of the provenpackager
> > group with Packaging Sponsors, and Jesse has made a proposal(1) on
> > guidelines for approving someone to the provenpackager group.
> > 
> >      1. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-January/msg01573.html
> > 
> 
> IMO this is not a moot point at all, because even after the group was
> reset, there are people in there that I don't want to see there.
> 
> For example I just found out that one of the people I sponsor is proven
> packager. Of course I do trust him, otherwise I would not have sponsored
> him, but I doubt that 2 packages (!) and 3 months of experience are
> enough for a proven packager.

Umm, it is moot, since the *reset* hasn't actually occurred yet.  If the
person your referring to, isn't a Package sponsor he will not be a
provenpackager in the reseed.

Later,
/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090129/98b7aaa1/attachment.sig>