Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Christoph Wickert]

Am Donnerstag, den 29.01.2009, 06:22 -0500 schrieb Brian Pepple:
> On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 11:58 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 28.01.2009, 20:25 -0500 schrieb Brian Pepple:
> > 
> > > This is all a moot point now though, since a couple of weeks ago FESCo
> > > approved a proposal to reset the initial seeding of the provenpackager
> > > group with Packaging Sponsors, and Jesse has made a proposal(1) on
> > > guidelines for approving someone to the provenpackager group.
> > > 
> > >      1. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-January/msg01573.html
> > > 
> > 
> > IMO this is not a moot point at all, because even after the group was
> > reset, there are people in there that I don't want to see there.
> > 
> > For example I just found out that one of the people I sponsor is proven
> > packager. Of course I do trust him, otherwise I would not have sponsored
> > him, but I doubt that 2 packages (!) and 3 months of experience are
> > enough for a proven packager.
> 
> Umm, it is moot, since the *reset* hasn't actually occurred yet.  

Why not, if the proposal was approved already "weeks ago"?

Regards,
Christoph