Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Jesse Keating]

On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 17:42 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>  Effectively this means: Only a single sponsor needs to trust the
> particular person to make him a proven packager, no matter how many
> other sponsors disagree with that decision. IMO this requirement is
> weaker than a given number of packages.
> After he was sponsored the new proven packager can sponsor as many other
> "pseudo-proven" packagers as he wants, even if they are not trustworthy.
> Other sponsors have no way to prevent this, so I'm pretty sure we'll end
> up with a large number of proven packagers again pretty soon.
> 
> Or am I mistaken here?

No, that's one view of it.

It's just a proposal, you're welcome to suggest changes or make your own
proposal like Robert did.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090129/07114b21/attachment.sig>