Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Toshio Kuratomi]

Christoph Wickert wrote:

> After he was sponsored the new proven packager can sponsor as many other
> "pseudo-proven" packagers as he wants, even if they are not trustworthy.
> Other sponsors have no way to prevent this, so I'm pretty sure we'll end
> up with a large number of proven packagers again pretty soon.
> 
This part actually isn't mentioned in the proposal -- Should people in
provenpackagers automatically be sponsor level (as it is now)?  Or
should we differentiate between provenpackager(users) and
provenpackager(sponsors) as packager is now?

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090129/e94ba51e/attachment.sig>