Feature proposal: Extended Life Cycle Support

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Tue Jul 7 21:16:57 UTC 2009


On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 23:06 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> 
> This may be disliked by upstream and others, because it creates bogus security 
> update notification mails, that say that there are security updates for 
> packages that are no security updates, e.g.:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-
> September/msg00723.html
> 
> Probably these mails are also parsed by third parties, e.g. LWN, because they 
> also repeat that there were security issues in packages that did not have any 
> security issues.


Why was this update marked as security, but not bundled with the package
that actually had the security issue that you were rebuilding for?  When
the entire list of packages is in one email then it makes sense.  Such
as https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1095.html  where all the
packages are listed under one announcement instead of individually.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090707/ce40fc53/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list