beagle

drago01 drago01 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 14 16:43:11 UTC 2009


On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:12 PM, drago01<drago01 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Juan Rodriguez<nushio at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:07 AM, drago01 <drago01 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi<a.badger at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > On 07/14/2009 04:16 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>> >> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:48:33 +0200, Michael wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> * Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>      beagle-owner AT fedoraproject DOT org
>>> >>>
>>> >>>      Recipient address rejected:
>>> >>>      User unknown in local recipient table (state 14).
>>> >>>
>>> >>> * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name  shows more than
>>> >>> a
>>> >>> dozen people on watchcommit+commit, but no package owner. It's an
>>> >>> orphan.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs  shows more than
>>> >>> a
>>> >>> dozen open tickets, but nobody is subscribed to watchbugzilla.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> * "yum list beagle" shows beagle-0.3.9-6.fc11 in "fedora".
>>> >>
>>> >> There is still no beagle-owner for this package.
>>> >>
>>> > So, it looks like the desktop team isn't interested in picking up beagle
>>> > (and they're most of the people in the commit/watchcommit) for the
>>> > package.  If no one else is willing to take ownership, I think we should
>>> > block the package for rawhide and list it as retired for not having
>>> > someone interested in working on it.
>>>
>>> It does not even build on rawhide right now (epiphany related breakage).
>>>
>>> I dropped it due to lack of time (which is worse rather than better
>>> now) but nobody responded to my mail where I was searching for a new
>>> maintainer.

Juan just took ownership of beagle, so the issue (not having a
maintainer) is solved now.




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list