xulrunner-1.9.1.1-1.fc11.x86_64 update pulls in i586 packages

[Matthew Woehlke]

Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>> But why does yum assume that a dependency of an x86_64 package can be
>> satisfied by an i586 one?
> 
> Why not?
> 
> If something requires FOO and something else provides FOO - what 
> difference does it make if it is from another arch as long as the arch 
> is compatible with the system?

That only works if FOO is an executable and not a library, no?

-- 
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
-- 
"What is a release plan, anyway?" -- Oswald Buddenhagen
   ...who I'm sure did not mean it seriously ;-)